Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: http://dspace.wunu.edu.ua/handle/316497/37668
Повний запис метаданих
Поле DCЗначенняМова
dc.contributor.authorKoziuk, Viktor-
dc.contributor.authorHayda, Yuryi-
dc.contributor.authorDluhopolskyi, Oleksandr-
dc.contributor.authorKlapkiv, Yuryi-
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-08T18:56:10Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-08T18:56:10Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationKoziuk, V. Hayda, Y., Dluhopolskyi, O., Klapkiv, Y. Stringency of environmental regulations vs global competitiveness: Empirical analysis // Economics & Sociology. Vol. 12, No 4, 2019, 278-298.uk_UA
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.tneu.edu.ua/handle/316497/37668-
dc.descriptionAt the current stage of socio-economic development of the countries in the context of numerous international summits on climate change, the emergence problem of additional regulatory and tax burdens of environmental standards is nowadays actualized, which creates new challenges and opportunities for the competitiveness of national economies. The formation of a qualitatively new model of greening national economies in the context of welfare is linked to the emergence of radically new challenges: climate change, an aging population, environmental and food crises, new demands on the quality and quantity of public goods, etc. All this requires a review of the fundamental foundations of macroeconomic and institutional analysis of welfare states in the context of the ecological vector of development. A comprehensive statistical analysis of long-term indicators of global competitiveness, environmental performance and the stringency of environmental regulations on a large sample of countries confirms the hypothesis that it is possible to internalize the significant stringency of environmental regulations in welfare states and maintain a high level of global competitiveness against the background of high quality environmental goods. The clinal nature of the country ordination according to the studied indices indicates the absence of a wide gap between countries of different clusters and the possibility of increasing the global competitiveness and quality of the environmental performance of the lower groups by strengthening the stringency of environmental regulations while improving the quality of their institutions and inclusion (through the development of education, science, culture) into the system of individual and social values of environmental preferences.uk_UA
dc.description.abstractThe article focuses on assessing the global competitiveness of countries in the context of their environmental regulatory stringency. The article analyzes the views of scientists on the need to slow down economic growth and transition to stable economy, the relationship between economic growth and environmental changes in the form of environmental Kuznets curve, as well as environmental policy instruments along with the degree of their stringency. The authors put forward and confirm the hypothesis that the quality of institutions and the value assessment of environmental goods directly affect the competitiveness of national economies, regardless of environmental stringency. A comprehensive statistical analysis of the perennial indices of global competitiveness, environmental performance and stringency of environmental regulations on a large sample of countries confirms the hypothesis that significant stringency of environmental regulations in welfare states can be internalized and that their global competitiveness remains high against the background of high-quality environmental goods.uk_UA
dc.publisherEconomics & Sociology. Vol. 12, No 4, 2019, 278-298.uk_UA
dc.subjectThe concept of sustainable development, which is actively promoted internationally and implemented in national legislation of many countries, emphasizes that “sustainable development is aimed at meeting the needs of the present generation without sacrificing the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (Butlin, 1987). In fact, sustainable development theory, with its emphasis on greening, is an alternative to the paradigm of extensive economic growth.uk_UA
dc.subjectKeywords: sustainable development, ecology, environmental policy, stringency, competitiveness.uk_UA
dc.titleStringency of environmental regulations vs global competitiveness: Empirical analysis.uk_UA
dc.typeArticleuk_UA
Розташовується у зібраннях:Статті

Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл Опис РозмірФормат 
17_841_Koziuk et al_Economics & Sociology. Vol. 12, No 4, 2019, 278-298..pdf1.03 MBAdobe PDFПереглянути/Відкрити


Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.